[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090423145652.cce2d0f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:56:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ville Syrjälä <syrjala@....fi>
Cc: roel.kluin@...il.com, linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, adaplas@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] fbcmap: non working tests on unsigned
cmap->start
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:47:38 +0300
Ville Syrj__l__ <syrjala@....fi> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:41:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:26:33 +0200
> > Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > vi include/linux/fb.h +478
> > >
> > > Note that struct fb_cmap_user cmap->start in fb_set_user_cmap() is unsigned.
> > > Should there maybe be a test:
> > >
> > > if (cmap->start > MAX || ...)
> > >
> > > (and what should MAX be then?)
> > >
> > > Otherwise you may want to apply the cleanup patch below
> > >
> > > Roel
> > > ------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
> > > Remove redundant tests on unsigned
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbcmap.c b/drivers/video/fbcmap.c
> > > index f53b9f1..958bf4e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/video/fbcmap.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/video/fbcmap.c
> > > @@ -266,8 +266,7 @@ int fb_set_user_cmap(struct fb_cmap_user *cmap, struct fb_info *info)
> > > rc = -ENODEV;
> > > goto out;
> > > }
> > > - if (cmap->start < 0 || (!info->fbops->fb_setcolreg &&
> > > - !info->fbops->fb_setcmap)) {
> > > + if (!info->fbops->fb_setcolreg && !info->fbops->fb_setcmap) {
> > > rc = -EINVAL;
> > > goto out1;
> > > }
> >
> > argh.
> >
> > - Perhaps userspace can kill the kernel by sending a "negative"
> > `start'. Removing the test will make it even less likely that we'll
> > fix this bug.
>
> Shouldn't happen. 'start' is used as the starting index for the hardware
> palette, 'start+len-1' is the last index. All drivers should already check
> the passed values since the maximum index depends on the display mode.
> And I suppose the worst thing that could happen if the driver fails to
> check the values would be incorrect colors.
OK.
I wonder if all drivers _do_ check. It probably doesn't matter much, as
it's a privileged operation (I assume?)
> > - If this bug doesn't exist, and there _is_ userspace which is
> > legitimately sending in "negative" values of `start' (unlikely?) then
> > we will break userspace if we fix this comparison.
>
> The comparison will always be false since 'start' is unsigned so how
> would anything break?
By "fix this comparison" I meant converting it to
if ((signed)cmap->start < 0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists