[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090422215825.f83e1b27.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:58:25 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
Carl Henrik Lunde <chlunde@...g.uio.no>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, eric.rannaud@...il.com,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
fernando@....ntt.co.jp, dradford@...ehost.com,
Gui@...p1.linux-foundation.org, agk@...rceware.org,
subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
matt@...ehost.com, roberto@...it.it, ngupta@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] ext3: do not throttle metadata and journal IO
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:35:48 -0400 Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> I hope someone like akpm is paying very close attention and auditing
> these patches both from an low-level patch cleanliness point of view
> as well as a high-level design review.
Not yet, really. But I intend to. Largely because I've always been
very skeptical that anyone has found a good solution to...
> Or at least that *someone* is
> doing so and can perhaps document how all of these knobs interact.
> After all, if they are going to be separate, and someone turns the I/O
> throttling knob without bothering to turn the write throttling knob
> --- what's going to happen? An OOM? That's not going to be very safe
> or friendly for the sysadmin who plans to be configuring the system.
... this problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists