[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090423233157.GA22981@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:31:57 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joe Malicki <jmalicki@...acarta.com>,
Michael Itz <mitz@...acarta.com>,
Kenneth Baker <bakerk@...acarta.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] do_execve() must not clear fs->in_exec if it was
set by another thread
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 01:01:56AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> If do_execve() fails after check_unsafe_exec(), it clears fs->in_exec
> unconditionally. This is wrong if we race with our sub-thread which
> also does do_execve:
[snip]
Applied (both of those).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists