[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090423063949.8DE92FC3C7@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: jdike@...toit.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: PT_DTRACE && uml
> (cc Jeff Dike)
I've also CC'd the UML hackers' mailing list.
> So, arch/um/ seems to be the only user of PT_DTRACE.
>
> I do not understand this code at all. It looks as if we can just
> s/PT_DTRACE/TIF_SINGLESTEP/.
>
> But it can't be that simple?
I don't really understand off hand how UML is using PT_DTRACE either.
But clearly it (or any real arch) that needs a flag for an arch purpose
can use a TIF_* bit instead of touching ->ptrace, and should do that.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists