[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904240410.52543.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:10:51 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hcegtvedt@...el.com, vapier@...too.org, rongkai.zhan@...driver.com,
balajirrao@...nmoko.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: Make rtc_update_irq callable with irqs enabled
On Friday 24 April 2009, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> I'm not tying to fix call issues or lockdep politics,
> just to understand if it's possible to avoid disabling the IRQs.
>
> i.e.,
>
> use spin_lock() in the IRQ handler and spin_lock_irq/irq_save
> in the setup functions.
I think you're describing how the *current* scheme is supposed
to work ... except that some IRQ handlers aren't calling the
rtc_update_irq() routine with IRQs blocked.
Yes, that current scheme works ... modulo those buggy handlers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists