[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090424083128.0bf549df@bike.lwn.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:31:28 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LFSDEV <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 -tip] umount_begin BKL pushdown
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:57:44 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > When that happens, could you please put it into a separate,
> > append-only branch i could pull (after some initial test-time) into
> > tip:kill-the-BKL?
>
> And just wondering how all this relates to Jonathan's (currently empty)
> bkl-removal tree (that is merged into linux-next)?
I set up my tree after a request from Linus; it was meant as a place
for near-term BKL-removal stuff to accumulate. In the last couple of
cycles, it's only had a small trickle of stuff that I've been able to
do myself. Ingo's tree is a rather grander vision, including a bunch
of debugging stuff and more.
The time for my tree may be nearing its end, but I'd just as soon keep
it around for a little longer. I may yet find some time to do some
more work in this area.
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists