[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904241057440.23249@vinegar-pot.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:32:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....edu>,
Waseem Daher <wdaher@....edu>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Kyle McMaartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add support for compiling with -ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> What would you think about posting these patches plus -ffunction-sections/
> -fdata-sections patch to -mm tree, -tip tree, or -next tree as
> "playable" Ksplice patchset?
The section rename patch often merge conflicts with other changes. I
think that having it sit out in one of those trees for another release
would result in a lot of unnecessary work rebasing patches between that
tree and Linus' tree.
Once these -ffunction-sections support patches are merged, I intend to
post the rest of the Ksplice patchset for one of those trees.
> If there are actual problems on those arch, I think you'd better post
> these patches as bugfixes with bug reports.
These problems are all discussed in the commit messages of the relevant
patches.
One patch fixes modposting a kernel with more than 65536 ELF sections.
It is certainly possible to get this many with allyesconfig and
-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections.
Another fixes the issue that when you build with -ffunction-sections,
modpost will print a large number of spurious warnings when it sees
sections like .rodata.__func__.12345 which are generated by the __FUNC__
macro.
The patch with many scattered changes fixes the problem that with
-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections, a function named head gets put in the
".text.head" section, and your "static int percpu" ends up in the
".data.percpu" section and probably ends up being made percpu. This is a
potentially nasty problem.
-Tim Abbott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists