lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49F1E348.2060309@RedHat.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:05:28 -0400
From:	Steve Dickson <SteveD@...hat.com>
To:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
CC:	Linux NFS Mailing list <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sunrpc: Adding trace points to status routines.

Hey Trond,

Here is a very simple patch that adds three trace points 
to the sunrpc state machine. The trace points are strategically
placed so they will only be called during error conditions. The 
purpose of these trace point is to show processes that are spinning
or get hung up in the NFS code and its associated subsystems.

Case in point. Recently I had a customer that was seeing 
rpciod spinning (using %100 of the cpu) for a relative
short amount time (actually I think I mentioned this bug
to you). 

Using systemtap scripts that only showed errors in the 
rpc status routines, I was able to determine the process was
spinning in the bind code. Basically doing an IPv6 bind
with no takers (although we are still working on it).

So it occurred to me, that it would have been very handy to
have a light weight mechanism that only showed errors the sunrpc 
code was processing. So I ported those systemtap scripts into 
trace points.

Note, we did try to use the existing dprintk() but it took much 
much longer for the problem to occur, if at all. Plus when the 
problem did happen, the volume of data to sieve through 
as a bit daunting.

An example of the the output is:

<...>-2684  [001]  1437.010389: call_status: 100003[4]:0 status=-107
                               routine name: prog[version]:Proc tk_status

which shows who is failing (i.e. the program number and version) and 
what they are trying to do (the procedure number).

Now there are some common errors like ETIMOUT and EAGAIN, but we can 
filter those  out using the 'filer' file that the trace points 
system supplies.

Please consider... I really think light weight information will be
very handy... 

steved.
 
Author: Steve Dickson <steved@...hat.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 24 11:12:31 2009 -0400

    Adds three trace points to the status routines in the
    sunrpc state machine. The trace points will only execute
    in error conditions.
    
    The goal of these trace points it to make it easier to
    debug process that spin or get hung up in the NFS and
    related subsystems.
    
    Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@...hat.com>

diff --git a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f502eb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+#if !defined(_TRACE_SUNRPC_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define _TRACE_SUNRPC_H
+
+#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
+
+#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
+#define TRACE_SYSTEM sunrpc
+
+TRACE_EVENT(call_status,
+
+	TP_PROTO(struct rpc_task *task),
+
+	TP_ARGS(task),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(u32, cl_prog)
+		__field(u32, cl_vers)
+		__field(u32, p_proc)
+		__field(int, tk_status)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+		__entry->cl_vers = task->tk_client->cl_vers;
+		__entry->p_proc = task->tk_client->cl_procinfo->p_proc;
+		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+		__entry->tk_status = task->tk_status;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("%d[%d]:%d status=%d", __entry->cl_prog, 
+		__entry->cl_vers,__entry->p_proc, __entry->tk_status)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(bind_status,
+
+	TP_PROTO(struct rpc_task *task),
+
+	TP_ARGS(task),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(u32, cl_prog)
+		__field(u32, cl_vers)
+		__field(u32, p_proc)
+		__field(int, tk_status)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+		__entry->cl_vers = task->tk_client->cl_vers;
+		__entry->p_proc = task->tk_client->cl_procinfo->p_proc;
+		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+		__entry->tk_status = task->tk_status;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("%d[%d]:%d status=%d", __entry->cl_prog, 
+		__entry->cl_vers,__entry->p_proc, __entry->tk_status)
+);
+TRACE_EVENT(connect_status,
+
+	TP_PROTO(struct rpc_task *task, int status),
+
+	TP_ARGS(task, status),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(u32, cl_prog)
+		__field(u32, cl_vers)
+		__field(u32, p_proc)
+		__field(int, tk_status)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+		__entry->cl_vers = task->tk_client->cl_vers;
+		__entry->p_proc = task->tk_client->cl_procinfo->p_proc;
+		__entry->cl_prog = task->tk_client->cl_prog;
+		__entry->tk_status = status;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("%d[%d]:%d status=%d", __entry->cl_prog, 
+		__entry->cl_vers,__entry->p_proc, __entry->tk_status)
+
+);
+#endif /* __TRACE_SUNRPC_H */
+
+/* This part must be outside protection */
+#include <trace/define_trace.h>
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
index 5abab09..b86ee2a 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
 #include <linux/sunrpc/rpc_pipe_fs.h>
 #include <linux/sunrpc/metrics.h>
 
+#include <linux/ftrace.h>
+#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
+#include <trace/events/sunrpc.h>
 
 #ifdef RPC_DEBUG
 # define RPCDBG_FACILITY	RPCDBG_CALL
@@ -957,6 +960,7 @@ call_bind_status(struct rpc_task *task)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	trace_bind_status(task);
 	switch (task->tk_status) {
 	case -ENOMEM:
 		dprintk("RPC: %5u rpcbind out of memory\n", task->tk_pid);
@@ -1038,6 +1042,7 @@ call_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	trace_connect_status(task, status);
 	switch (status) {
 		/* if soft mounted, test if we've timed out */
 	case -ETIMEDOUT:
@@ -1141,6 +1146,7 @@ call_status(struct rpc_task *task)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	trace_call_status(task);
 	task->tk_status = 0;
 	switch(status) {
 	case -EHOSTDOWN:

                                        
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ