[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090424201952.GQ8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:19:52 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha: binfmt_aout fix
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 07:46:02PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 04:05:49PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 06:47:38PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> > > Fixed by changing the registration order of the default
> > > binfmt handlers using list_add_tail() and introducing insert_binfmt()
> > > function which places new handler on the top of the binfmt list.
> > > This might be generally useful for installing arch-specific frontends
> > > for default handlers or just for overriding them.
> >
> > Hmm... How about always doing list_add_tail() instead?
>
> That would fix the module case, but gets broken when binfmt_aout
> in built-in, because the generic handlers are registered pretty
> early (core_initcall) and alpha binfmt_loader is an arch_initcall.
OK, probably the easiest way to deal with that.
ACK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists