[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090424001439.GA27897@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:14:40 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....edu>,
Waseem Daher <wdaher@....edu>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add support for compiling with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:48:52PM -0400, Tim Abbott wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > I'd be ok with merging it, but I haven't really gotten a strong feeling
> > that anybody is going to enable it or use it.
>
> Linus,
>
> Would you be willing to merge the first 3 patches in this patch series at
> this point? I'm resending these patches to resolve some conflicts that
> was recently introduced.
>
> To summarize the discussion, there are three uses for this code that have
> significant interest.
>
> One is decreasing the kernel size. Denys Vlasenko has numbers that using
> the linker's --gc-sections option (for which these patches are a
> prerequisite) saves 10% of the kernel size when CONFIG_MODULES=n, and 1%
> when CONFIG_MODULES=y. Paul Mundt thinks many embedded users would use
> this if it were available.
>
> A related use is cleaning up a lot of ifdefs that exist only to decrease
> the kernel size. Several developers commented favorably on the direction
> of using section garbage collection for dead code removal.
>
> Finally, Ksplice depends on the option added by this patch series.
>
> The first 3 patches in this patch series fix problems associated with
> using -ffunction-sections. As there are some architectures currently
> using -ffunction-sections, these should ideally be merged now, especially
> the first patch which involves scattered changes.
>
Given that this fixes issues with the existing in-tree users, it would
help to make them aware of this also.. added to the CC.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists