linux-kernel - Re: staging indentation & braces disagreement list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090425174826.GA26972@suse.de>
Date:	Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:48:26 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: staging indentation & braces disagreement list

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:28:06PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Below is a list from my braces vs indentation pipeline against  
> staging (mainline 0c8454f56623)... Plenty of add-bracing/reindentation 
> required but I'm busy elsewhere so I leave it up to somebody who wants
> to eyeball the code to see which of the alternatives is the
> right one. Please disregard the line numbers, they don't match
> with the source because the source was trimmed beforehand.

I wouldn't worry about the majority of these, they are getting replaced
with "real" wireless drivers soon :)

> drivers/staging/frontier/tranzport.c
> 183
> 	if (dev->offline == 2 && dev->interrupt_in_buffer[1] == 0xff)
> 		goto resubmit;
> 		if (dev->offline == 1 && dev->interrupt_in_buffer[1] == 0xff) {
> 			dev->offline = 2;


this is probably a bug :(

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/