[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090425133052.4cb711f5@nehalam>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:30:52 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kaber@...sh.net,
jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
jengelh@...ozas.de, r000n@...0n.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: iptables no lockdep is needed..
Epilogue due to master Jarek. Lockdep carest not about the locking
doth bestowed. Therefore no keys are needed.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
---
net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c 2009-04-25 13:25:48.115026283 -0700
+++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c 2009-04-25 13:26:15.646215635 -0700
@@ -1145,14 +1145,9 @@ static int __init xt_init(void)
{
unsigned int i;
int rv;
- static struct lock_class_key xt_lock_key[NR_CPUS];
- for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- rwlock_t *lock = &per_cpu(xt_info_locks, i);
-
- rwlock_init(lock);
- lockdep_set_class(lock, xt_lock_key+i);
- }
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+ rwlock_init(&per_cpu(xt_info_locks, i));
xt = kmalloc(sizeof(struct xt_af) * NFPROTO_NUMPROTO, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!xt)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists