[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090426204707.17495.89167.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:17:07 +0530
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arun Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] sched: loadbalancer hacks for forced packing of
tasks
Pack more tasks in a group so as to reduce number of CPUs
used to run the work in the system.
Just for load balancing purpose, assume the group capacity
has been increased by group_capacity_bump_pct()
Hacks:
o Make non-idle cpus also perform powersave balance so
that we can pull more tasks into the group
o Increase group capacity for calculation
o Increase load-balancing threshold so that even if a
group is loaded by group_capacity_bump_pct, consider
it balanced
*** RFC patch for discussion ***
Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index f88ed04..b20dbcb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3234,6 +3234,7 @@ struct sd_lb_stats {
int group_imb; /* Is there imbalance in this sd */
#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
int power_savings_balance; /* Is powersave balance needed for this sd */
+ unsigned int group_capacity_bump; /* % increase in group capacity */
struct sched_group *group_min; /* Least loaded group in sd */
struct sched_group *group_leader; /* Group which relieves group_min */
unsigned long min_load_per_task; /* load_per_task in group_min */
@@ -3321,12 +3322,16 @@ static inline void init_sd_power_savings_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
* Busy processors will not participate in power savings
* balance.
*/
- if (idle == CPU_NOT_IDLE || !(sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
+ if ((idle == CPU_NOT_IDLE &&
+ sched_mc_power_savings <
+ POWERSAVINGS_INCREASE_GROUP_CAPACITY_1) ||
+ !(sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
sds->power_savings_balance = 0;
else {
sds->power_savings_balance = 1;
sds->min_nr_running = ULONG_MAX;
sds->leader_nr_running = 0;
+ sds->group_capacity_bump = group_capacity_bump_pct(sd);
}
}
@@ -3586,6 +3591,9 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd, int this_cpu,
if (local_group && balance && !(*balance))
return;
+ /* Bump up group capacity for forced packing of tasks */
+ sgs.group_capacity = sgs.group_capacity *
+ sds->group_capacity_bump / 100;
sds->total_load += sgs.group_load;
sds->total_pwr += group->__cpu_power;
@@ -3786,6 +3794,10 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, int this_cpu,
if (100 * sds.max_load <= sd->imbalance_pct * sds.this_load)
goto out_balanced;
+ /* Push the upper limits for overload */
+ if (100 * sds.max_load <= sds.group_capacity_bump * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE)
+ goto out_balanced;
+
sds.busiest_load_per_task /= sds.busiest_nr_running;
if (sds.group_imb)
sds.busiest_load_per_task =
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists