[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49F3DBE7.4030905@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:58:31 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: petkovbb@...il.com, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update IDE entry
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:21:16PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> Moreover, I would prefer getting patches which don't need updating. ;-)
>
> Sounds like a good idea, let's do that! :0)
>
Great. :-)
To rebase or not seems to be an issue people have different opinions
about. Some trees get rebased regularly while others seldomly or
never. Not being a maintainer, I prefer trees which don't get rebased
but being able to provide cross-tree sync points is one of the biggest
benefits and as long as they can be established when necessary, I
guess to-each-his/her-own.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists