[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090426093103.GA19267@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:31:03 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13185] New x86 warning
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13185
> Subject : New x86 warning
> Submitter : Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> Date : 2009-04-22 6:46 (4 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124038280020950&w=4
I saw this warning with certain GCC versions for several kernel
cycles, so it's not any recent change that triggers this and it is
not a regression.
GCC is simply wrong here - i have posted a workaround for that but
it is too ugly to be merged upstream.
> Handled-By : Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/19330/
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/19406/
This patch regresses on older GCC versions and doesnt really address
the GCC false positive warning either, it just removes the inline
function that triggers the warning.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists