[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49F58A87.5020405@monstr.eu>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:35:51 +0200
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.williams@...alogix.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/30] microblaze_mmu_v1: stat.h MMU update
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:32:18AM +0200, monstr@...str.eu wrote:
>> +# ifdef __uClinux__
>> struct stat64 {
>> unsigned long long st_dev;
>> unsigned long __unused1;
>> @@ -69,5 +69,29 @@ struct stat64 {
>>
>> unsigned long __unused8;
>> };
>> +# else /* __uClinux__ */
>> +/* FIXME */
>> +struct stat64 {
>> + unsigned long long st_dev; /* Device.*/
>> + unsigned long long st_ino; /* File serial number.*/
>> + unsigned int st_mode; /* File mode.*/
>> + unsigned int st_nlink; /* Link count. */
>> + unsigned int st_uid; /* User ID of the file's owner. */
>> + unsigned int st_gid; /* Group ID of the file's group. */
>> + unsigned long long st_rdev; /* Device number, if device. */
>> + unsigned short __pad2;
>> + long long st_size; /* Size of file, in bytes. */
>> + int st_blksize; /* Optimal block size for I/O. */
>> + long long st_blocks; /* No. 512-byte blocks allocated */
>> + int st_atime; /* Time of last access. */
>> + unsigned int st_atime_nsec;
>> + int st_mtime; /* Time of last modification. */
>> + unsigned int st_mtime_nsec;
>> + int st_ctime; /* Time of last status change. */
>> + unsigned int st_ctime_nsec;
>> + unsigned int __unused4;
>> + unsigned int __unused5;
>> +};
>> +# endif /* __uClinux__ */
>
> Userspace ABIs must not change because of MMU vs not.
>
:-)
I expect that someone will beat me for last two patches.
Short answer: You are right I know about.
Long answer: in stat64 structure I wanted to find out more information
about stat64 structure. I mean there are some variables and they have different
types and I would like to know about more info.
For example
If make sense long long type for st_blocks. IMHO unsigned will be better.
And I would like to create new stat64 structure where is not a fault for both noMMU/MMU version.
In noMMU implementation is st_blocks unsigned long. Is it OK? or unsigned long long is better?
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists