linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Cleanup: Remove unused __REQ_NR_BITS from enum rq_flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200904271735.02007.knikanth@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:35:01 +0530
From:	Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup: Remove unused __REQ_NR_BITS from enum rq_flag_bits

On Monday 27 April 2009 17:16:33 Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27 2009, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> > The __REQ_NR_BITS  was being used by blk_dump_rq_flags() long back, while
> > printing the individual request flag bits as strings to limit to the used
> > bits. But it does not use it now. Remove unused enum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > index ba54c83..f41abbb 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > @@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ enum rq_flag_bits {
> >  	__REQ_COPY_USER,	/* contains copies of user pages */
> >  	__REQ_INTEGRITY,	/* integrity metadata has been remapped */
> >  	__REQ_NOIDLE,		/* Don't anticipate more IO after this one */
> > -	__REQ_NR_BITS,		/* stops here */
> >  };
> >
> >  #define REQ_RW		(1 << __REQ_RW)
>
> Lets turn it into something useful instead. It's meant to catch someone
> adding too many flags, how about something like this:
>
> Untested ;-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index d73eb76..e62ef94 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -2159,6 +2159,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kblockd_schedule_work);
>
>  int __init blk_dev_init(void)
>  {
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(__REQ_NR_BITS > 8 * sizeof(int));
> +
>  	kblockd_workqueue = create_workqueue("kblockd");
>  	if (!kblockd_workqueue)
>  		panic("Failed to create kblockd\n");

Good idea. How about this?

Thanks
Nikanth

Catch trying to use more bits than request->cmd_flags has.

Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>

---

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 07ab754..218f745 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -2156,6 +2156,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kblockd_schedule_work);
 
 int __init blk_dev_init(void)
 {
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(__REQ_NR_BITS > 8 * 
+			sizeof(((struct request *)0)->cmd_flags));
+
 	kblockd_workqueue = create_workqueue("kblockd");
 	if (!kblockd_workqueue)
 		panic("Failed to create kblockd\n");


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/