[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1240843435-1786-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:43:49 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] vfs: Call ->sync_fs() even if s_dirt is 0 (version 4)
sync_filesystems() has a condition that if wait == 0 and s_dirt == 0, then
->sync_fs() isn't called. This does not really make much sence since s_dirt is
generally used by a filesystem to mean that ->write_super() needs to be called.
But ->sync_fs() does different things. I even suspect that some filesystems
(btrfs?) sets s_dirt just to fool this logic.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
fs/super.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 4826540..d9759e0 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ restart:
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
down_read(&sb->s_umount);
async_synchronize_full_domain(&sb->s_async_list);
- if (sb->s_root && (wait || sb->s_dirt))
+ if (sb->s_root)
sb->s_op->sync_fs(sb, wait);
up_read(&sb->s_umount);
/* restart only when sb is no longer on the list */
--
1.6.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists