[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49F54F05.4030108@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:21:57 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
zhaolei@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, tzanussi@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ftrace: add a tracepoint for __raise_softirq_irqoff()
Mathieu Desnoyers 写道:
> * Xiao Guangrong (xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com) wrote:
>> From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
>>
>> This patch is modified from Mathieu Desnoyers' patch. The original patch
>> can be found here:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123791201816245&w=2
>> This tracepoint can trace the time stamp when softirq action is raised.
>>
>> Change log for v1 -> v2:
>> 1: Use TRACE_EVENT instead of DEFINE_TRACE
>> 2: Move the tracepoint from raise_softirq_irqoff() to __raise_softirq_irqoff()
>>
>
> Hi Xiao,
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>> ---
>> include/linux/interrupt.h | 9 ++++++++-
>> include/trace/events/irq.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
>> index 912c52c..86bae89 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
>> @@ -361,7 +361,14 @@ asmlinkage void do_softirq(void);
>> asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void);
>> extern void open_softirq(int nr, void (*action)(struct softirq_action *));
>> extern void softirq_init(void);
>> -#define __raise_softirq_irqoff(nr) do { or_softirq_pending(1UL << (nr)); } while (0)
>> +
>> +#include <trace/events/irq.h>
>
> Includes are usually at the beginning of the files.
>
> Besides that, the patch looks good.
>
Hi Mathieu:
I attempted to include <trace/events/irq.h> as your suggestion, but this results
in a cross references:
struct softirq_action have been used in tarce/event/irq.h.
so I move “include <trace/events/irq.h>” in the front of __raise_softirq_irqoff.
> Which tree is it for ? mainline 2.6.30-rc or Ingo's tip tree ?
>
> Working with Ingo on -tip is probably better so the work can be
> synchronized with Steven's work more easily.
>
This patch is work with Ingo on -tip tree
Thank you!
Xiao Guangrong
> Thanks a lot !
>
> Mathieu
>
>> +static inline void __raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr)
>> +{
>> + trace_irq_softirq_raise(nr);
>> + or_softirq_pending(1UL << nr);
>> +}
>> +
>> extern void raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr);
>> extern void raise_softirq(unsigned int nr);
>> extern void wakeup_softirqd(void);
>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/irq.h b/include/trace/events/irq.h
>> index 7686864..2628e08 100644
>> --- a/include/trace/events/irq.h
>> +++ b/include/trace/events/irq.h
>> @@ -90,6 +90,24 @@ TRACE_EVENT(softirq_exit,
>> TP_printk("softirq=%d action=%s", __entry->vec, __get_str(name))
>> );
>>
>> +TRACE_EVENT(irq_softirq_raise,
>> +
>> + TP_PROTO(unsigned int nr),
>> +
>> + TP_ARGS(nr),
>> +
>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> + __field( unsigned int, nr )
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_fast_assign(
>> + __entry->nr = nr;
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_printk("softirq=%d action=%s is raised",
>> + __entry->nr, softirq_to_name[__entry->nr])
>> +);
>> +
>> #endif /* _TRACE_IRQ_H */
>>
>> /* This part must be outside protection */
>> --
>> 1.6.1.2
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists