lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
cc:	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Replace the watermark-related union in struct zone with
 a watermark[] array

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:

> > I thought the suggestion was for something like
> > 
> > 	#define zone_wmark_min(z)	(z->pages_mark[WMARK_MIN])
> > 	...
> 
> Was it the only suggestion? I thought just replacing the union with an
> array would be an option as well.
> 
> The #define approach also requires setter versions like
> 
> static inline set_zone_wmark_min(struct zone *z, unsigned long val)
> {
> 	z->pages_mark[WMARK_MIN] = val;
> }
> 
> and you need one of those for each watermark if you are to avoid weirdness like
> 
> zone_wmark_min(z) = val;
> 
> which looks all wrong.

Agreed, but we only set watermarks in a couple of different locations and 
they really have no reason to change otherwise, so I don't think it's 
necessary to care too much about how the setter looks.

Adding individual get/set functions for each watermark seems like 
overkill.

I personally had no problem with the union struct aliasing the array, I 
think ->pages_min, ->pages_low, etc. are already very familiar.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ