[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40a4ed590904270153q306e80f2v62499434c64d92a6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:53:51 +0200
From: Zeno Davatz <zdavatz@...il.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hannes Wyss <hwyss@...see.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.29 runs out of memory and hangs.
Dear David
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:32 AM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> All allowable zones have minimum watermarks that define how much memory
> an oom killed task may use so that it can quickly exit. This is the
> purpose of the TIF_MEMDIE flag in the kernel.
Thanks for the info.
> The policy is better defined in userspace to determine what memory-hogging
> task should be killed in low memory situations. Users can already tune
> the /proc/pid/oom_adj score of any task so that the oom killer can prefer
> it over other tasks (see Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt). For low
> memory situations, however, userspace can act in any number of ways to
> prevent reaching an oom condition.
This may be off-Topic, but: Can I assign a PID to a process at
startup? Say Apache always should have PID 2755, or Ruby should always
have PID 1003. Otherwise how would I set the score for a PID at
Kernel-Boop-Up?
> Once the oom condition has been reached, however, the oom killer must act
> to free some memory, otherwise the kernel usually livelocks.
Interesting. In our case we did not have a score for Apache in
/proc/pid/oom_adj
that must have caused the livelock because oom_kill could not kill the
biggest task (Apache) in full.
Best
Zeno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists