lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090428091902.fc44efbc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:19:02 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp
Cc:	Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@....biglobe.ne.jp>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"hugh@...itas.com" <hugh@...itas.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix leak of swap accounting as stale swap cache under
 memcg

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:08:56 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@....biglobe.ne.jp> wrote:

> > Index: mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24/mm/vmscan.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24.orig/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -661,6 +661,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(st
> >  		if (PageAnon(page) && !PageSwapCache(page)) {
> >  			if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO))
> >  				goto keep_locked;
> > +			/* avoid making more stale swap caches */
> > +			if (memcg_stale_swap_congestion())
> > +				goto keep_locked;
> >  			if (!add_to_swap(page))
> >  				goto activate_locked;
> >  			may_enter_fs = 1;
> > 
> Well, as I mentioned before(http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124066623510867&w=2),
> this cannot avoid type-2(set !PageCgroupUsed by the owner process via
> page_remove_rmap()->mem_cgroup_uncharge_page() before being added to swap cache).
> If these swap caches go through shrink_page_list() without beeing freed
> for some reason, these swap caches doesn't go back to memcg's LRU.
> 
> Type-2 doesn't pressure memsw.usage, but you can see it by plotting
> "grep SwapCached /proc/meminfo".
> 
> And I don't think it's a good idea to add memcg_stale_swap_congestion() here.
> This means less possibility to reclaim pages.
> 
Hmm. maybe adding congestion_wait() ?

> Do you dislike the patch I attached in the above mail ?
> 
I doubt whether the patch covers all type-2 case.

> If not, please merge it(I tested your prvious version with some fixes and
> my patch, and it worked well). Or shall I send is as a separate patch
> to fix type-2 after your patch(yours looks good to me for type-1)?
> (to tell the truth, I want reuse memcg_free_unused_swapcache() in another patch)
> 
> 
I'll consider again and post v3.
But I'll go into a series of holidays, so, may not come back until May/6.

Thanks,
-Kame


> Thanks,
> Daisuke Nishimura.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ