[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49F65FA2.4010603@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:45:06 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kms in defconfig
Hello,
Dave Airlie wrote:
> My main worry is distro configs going forward, where they pull
> something from defconfig, granted I've no idea if that'll happen,
> maybe distro kernel maintainers are smarter than I give them credit
> for :-)
We're probably as dumb as or even dumber than you give credit for but
we do have testing cycles in place to compensate for it, so I don't
think distros-might-screw-up needs to be a concern when deciding what
gets turned on in defconfig. :-)
I think defconfig should enable options such that it shows where
upstream kernel is headed, so FWIW +1 for KMS from me.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists