[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090428101448.GA28495@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:14:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86/irq: make MSI irq_desc numa aware -v3
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_IRQ_DESC
> + /* different node ?*/
> + if (desc_new->node != node)
> + desc = move_irq_desc(desc, node);
> +#endif
this should have been CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC. But even with
that fixed, CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC is _removed_ in the #2
patch in your series and never reintroduced!
I've fixed these two bugs in the series and i'm thinking about
applying them, but this really makes me think how much testing
you've put into this code.
You really should check that the feature actually does what you
think, that it can be enabled and you should also check the
before/after layout of irq descriptors on a NUMA box.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists