linux-kernel - Re: Patch to add mioa701 glue for voltage regulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1240915086.14165.111.camel@vega.slimlogic.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:38:06 +0100
From:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To:	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
Cc:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>, eric.miao@...vell.com,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Patch to add mioa701 glue for voltage regulation

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 09:13 +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> wrote:
> > Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk> writes:
> >
> >> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:30 +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >>> Hi Mark and Eric,
> >>>
> >>> I have that patch which adds voltage regulation definitions to mioa701
> >>> board. The trick is, this patch depends on two others :
> >>>
> >>>  - one which will be merged through Mark's regulator tree.
> >>>    This one is mandatory as a compiling dependency exists through include files.
> >>>
> >>>  - one which will be merge through Eric pxa tree.
> >>>    This is the cpufreq one, and has a "very weak" dependency, as only the
> >>>    "vcc_core" name _is_ the dependency.
> >>>
> >>> I think the easiest way to solve the compiling dependency
> >>> (include/linux/regulator.max1586.h) is to make that patch go through regulator
> >>> tree as well for linux-next, even if it's arm machine specific, don't you ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> If fine with this going through regulator providing I get an ACK from
> >> Eric.
> >
> > Eric,
> >
> > Since Liam took the max1586 regulator through his tree, would you state if you
> > ack that please ?
> >
> 
> I'd really be happy to. However, my concern is that this patch modifies
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c _only_, so it would be better to go through
> my tree so that I can manage all the potential merge conflicts. There are
> several other changes to mioa701.c and I expect the content in
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/* to be heavily changed due to recent addition
> of pxa168/pxa910 support.
> 
> The issue of dependency, as was always before, can be resolved by
> putting this into 'pending' and monitoring the status of merge window
> before sending the PULL request.
> 
> Liam,
> 
> Sounds OK to you?

Eric,

I think it probably better going through your PXA tree now (to avoid any
conflicts). I had originally thought this patch was part of a larger
series that mostly touched regulator.

Robert,

Could you resubmit to Eric. Mark or I will ack. Please remove the
max1586_v6_info until it has some consumers.

Thanks

Liam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/