[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49F71F4A.3080908@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:22:50 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] lockd: fix FILE_LOCKING=n build error
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
lockd/svclock.c is missing a header file <linux/fs.h>.
<linux/fs.h> is missing a definition of locks_release_private()
for the config case of FILE_LOCKING=n, causing a build error:
fs/lockd/svclock.c:330: error: implicit declaration of function 'locks_release_private'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
---
fs/lockd/svclock.c | 1 +
include/linux/fs.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- linux-next-20090428.orig/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ linux-next-20090428/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
--- linux-next-20090428.orig/include/linux/fs.h
+++ linux-next-20090428/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1183,6 +1183,10 @@ static inline void locks_remove_flock(st
return;
}
+static inline void locks_release_private(struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+}
+
static inline void posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
{
return;
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists