[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090428205403.GP27382@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:54:03 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] proc: export more page flags in /proc/kpageflags
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 01:47:07PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> wrote:
> > Bah. The rate of change is proportional to #cpus, not #pages. Assuming
> > you've got 1024 processors, you could run the scan in parallel in .2
> > seconds still.
>
> That would help ... it would also make the patch to support this
> functionality a lot more complex.
I suspect 4TB memory users are used to some things running
a little slower. I'm not sure we really need to make every obscure
debugging functionality scale well to these systems too.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists