[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1240951947.15263.5.camel@pasglop>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:52:27 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: Please revert edada399 and 9203fc9c
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 10:35 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> This is partly my fault :-(
> I acked them as I did not see the issue with conditional branches.
> Could I ask you to add a comment to the lds file about this.
I'm back :-)
Not a huge deal per-se, it's just that the patches were merged in Linus
tree only a few hours after being initially submitted it seems, which
doesn't leave much chance for anybody to test, to hit -next, or anything
like that... that was a little bit too trigger happy .
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists