[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090428130035.EBB9.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:25:23 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebmunson@...ibm.com,
mel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, cl@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: meminfo Committed_AS underflows
> > > > > > > committed = atomic_long_read(&vm_committed_space);
> > > > > > > + if (committed < 0)
> > > > > > > + committed = 0;
> > > > > >
> > >
> > > Is there a reason why we can't use a boring old percpu_counter for
> > > vm_committed_space? That way the meminfo code can just use
> > > percpu_counter_read_positive().
> > >
> > > Or perhaps just percpu_counter_read(). The percpu_counter code does a
> > > better job of handling large cpu counts than the
> > > mysteriously-duplicative open-coded stuff we have there.
> >
> > At that time, I thought smallest patch is better because it can send -stable
> > tree easily.
> > but maybe I was wrong. it made bikeshed discussion :(
>
> Yes, I know what you mean. But otoh it's a good idea to keep -stable
> in sync with mainline - it means that -stable can merge things which
> have had a suitable amount of testing.
Agreed.
> > Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: Eric B Munson <ebmunson@...ibm.com>
> > ---
> > fs/proc/meminfo.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/mman.h | 9 +++------
> > mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
> > mm/nommu.c | 13 +++++++------
> > mm/swap.c | 46 ----------------------------------------------
> > 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> Well that was nice.
>
> There's potential here for weird performance regressions, so I think
> that if we do this in mainline, we should wait a while (a few weeks?)
> before backporting it.
>
> Do we know how long this bug has existed for? Quite a while, I expect?
ACCT_THRESHOLD was introduced bit-keeper age.
powerpc default NR_CPUS is still less 128.
% grep NR_CPUS *
cell_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4
celleb_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4
chrp32_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4
g5_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4
iseries_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32
maple_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4
mpc86xx_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2
pasemi_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2
ppc64_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32
ps3_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2
pseries_defconfig:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=128
powerpc maximum NR_CPUS was increased following commit.
I'm not sure about one year is short or long.
==========================================================
commit 90035fe378c7459ba19c43c63d5f878284224ce4
Author: Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
Date: Thu Apr 24 13:43:49 2008 +1000
[POWERPC] Raise the upper limit of NR_CPUS and move the pacas into the BSS
This adds the required functionality to fill in all pacas at runtime.
With NR_CPUS=1024
text data bss dec hex filename
137 1704032 0 1704169 1a00e9 arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.o :Before
121 1179744 524288 1704153 1a00d9 arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.o :After
Also remove unneeded #includes from arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c
Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
index 5fc7fac..f7efaa9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
@@ -220,8 +220,8 @@ config SMP
If you don't know what to do here, say N.
config NR_CPUS
- int "Maximum number of CPUs (2-128)"
- range 2 128
+ int "Maximum number of CPUs (2-1024)"
+ range 2 1024
depends on SMP
default "32" if PPC64
default "4"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists