[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1240987349.4512.18.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:42:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Elladan <elladan@...imo.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: evict use-once pages first
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 19:29 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index eac9577..4c0304e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1489,6 +1489,21 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
> nr[l] = scan;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * When the system is doing streaming IO, memory pressure here
> + * ensures that active file pages get deactivated, until more
> + * than half of the file pages are on the inactive list.
> + *
> + * Once we get to that situation, protect the system's working
> + * set from being evicted by disabling active file page aging
> + * and swapping of swap backed pages. We still do background
> + * aging of anonymous pages.
> + */
> + if (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE] > nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE]) {
> + nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] = 0;
> + nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] = 0;
> + }
> +
Isn't there a hole where LRU_*_FILE << LRU_*_ANON and we now stop
shrinking INACTIVE_ANON even though it makes sense to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists