[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1241002046-8832-6-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:47:02 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/29] x86/perfcounters: protect per-cpu variables with compile barriers only
Per-cpu variables needn't to be protected with cpu barriers
(smp_wmb()). Protection is only needed for preemption on the same cpu
(rescheduling or the nmi handler). This can be done using a compiler
barrier only.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
index 75a0903..ad663d5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ try_generic:
/*
* Make it visible before enabling the hw:
*/
- smp_wmb();
+ barrier();
__hw_perf_counter_set_period(counter, hwc, idx);
__pmc_generic_enable(counter, hwc, idx);
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static void pmc_generic_disable(struct perf_counter *counter)
* Make sure the cleared pointer becomes visible before we
* (potentially) free the counter:
*/
- smp_wmb();
+ barrier();
/*
* Drain the remaining delta count out of a counter
--
1.6.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists