[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090429115943.GD11586@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:59:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
john@...nmccutchan.com, rlove@...ve.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] mutex: add atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:53:05 -0400
> Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Much like the atomic_dec_and_lock() function in which we take and hold a
> > spin_lock if we drop the atomic to 0 this function takes and holds the
> > mutex if we dec the atomic to 0.
>
> I sucked these patches into -mm, mainly for a bit of compile-time
> and runtime testing.
the locking API bit is already in the locking tree:
9ab772c: mutex: add atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock()
I added it 23 days ago. Please dont add it to -mm a second time ;-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists