linux-kernel - [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter, x86: consistent use of type int for counter index

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-6f00cada07bb5da7f751929d3173494dcc5446cc@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:07:06 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org, hpa@...or.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, robert.richter@....com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter, x86: consistent use of type int for counter index

Commit-ID:  6f00cada07bb5da7f751929d3173494dcc5446cc
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/6f00cada07bb5da7f751929d3173494dcc5446cc
Author:     Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:47:17 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:51:10 +0200

perf_counter, x86: consistent use of type int for counter index

The type of counter index is sometimes implemented as unsigned
int. This patch changes this to have a consistent usage of int.

[ Impact: cleanup ]

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1241002046-8832-21-git-send-email-robert.richter@....com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c |    8 ++++----
 include/linux/perf_counter.h       |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
index f7fd4a3..d8beebe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static void hw_perf_disable(int idx, u64 config)
 
 static inline void
 __pmc_fixed_disable(struct perf_counter *counter,
-		    struct hw_perf_counter *hwc, unsigned int __idx)
+		    struct hw_perf_counter *hwc, int __idx)
 {
 	int idx = __idx - X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
 	u64 ctrl_val, mask;
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ __pmc_fixed_disable(struct perf_counter *counter,
 
 static inline void
 __x86_pmu_disable(struct perf_counter *counter,
-		  struct hw_perf_counter *hwc, unsigned int idx)
+		  struct hw_perf_counter *hwc, int idx)
 {
 	if (unlikely(hwc->config_base == MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL))
 		__pmc_fixed_disable(counter, hwc, idx);
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ x86_perf_counter_set_period(struct perf_counter *counter,
 
 static inline void
 __pmc_fixed_enable(struct perf_counter *counter,
-		   struct hw_perf_counter *hwc, unsigned int __idx)
+		   struct hw_perf_counter *hwc, int __idx)
 {
 	int idx = __idx - X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
 	u64 ctrl_val, bits, mask;
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_disable(struct perf_counter *counter)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_counters *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_counters);
 	struct hw_perf_counter *hwc = &counter->hw;
-	unsigned int idx = hwc->idx;
+	int idx = hwc->idx;
 
 	/*
 	 * Must be done before we disable, otherwise the nmi handler
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_counter.h b/include/linux/perf_counter.h
index c3db52d..41aed42 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_counter.h
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ struct hw_perf_counter {
 			unsigned long			config_base;
 			unsigned long			counter_base;
 			int				nmi;
-			unsigned int			idx;
+			int				idx;
 		};
 		union { /* software */
 			atomic64_t			count;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/