[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090429143403.GJ8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:34:03 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Knoblauch <knobi@...bisoft.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tigran aivazian <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Analyzed/Solved: Booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:18:45PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > /etc/fstab, perhaps? That definitely looks like two mount(2) had to
> > have been done to cause that...
>
> Yeah, but how does one go about doing that?
>
> Using mount -f, I can convince mount to succeed, but I still have only
> one entry in /proc/mounts, despite what my mount binary imagines.
Huh?
-f Causes everything to be done except for the actual system call;
if it's not obvious, this ``fakes'' mounting the file system.
This option is useful in conjunction with the -v flag to deter-
mine what the mount command is trying to do. It can also be used
to add entries for devices that were mounted earlier with the -n
What are you talking about?
The interesting part is why mount(2) doesn't fail with -EBUSY on that
overmounting. Is there anything else mounted on /sys? That, or any
interesting patches applied to the tree (fs/sysfs/mount.c, fs/namespace.c)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists