[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090429154831.582e7828@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:48:31 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q: selinux_bprm_committed_creds() && signals/do_wait
> But, before fixing, I'd like to understand why we are doing
>
> flush_signal_handlers(current, 1);
> sigemptyset(¤t->blocked);
Interesting - this appear to be introducing a security hole by clearing
things daemons running setuid apps are entitled to rely upon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists