[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090429083654.7ecf0100.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:36:54 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] workqueue_trace: Add max execution time mesurement
for per worklet
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:45:28 -0400 (EDT) Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > * pointer to the real address.
> >
> > But the output formatting is the same: address, offset, size, modname.
> >
> > I found it a bit annoying, so I proposed the following patch recently:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/15/310
This looks OK. I'd assumed it was merged. Was there a problem with it?
> > And someone came with a better idea, IMO:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/17/105
>
> Note,
>
> If these ever do get merged, I would be happy to convert ftrace to use
> them to replace my version.
I spose I could use magic powers to sneak it into .30?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists