[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1240977176.3028.0.camel@ht.satnam>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:22:56 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: cpu_debug patches
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 19:28 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > @@ -850,10 +903,10 @@ static int cpu_init_cpu(void)
> > cpui = &cpu_data(cpu);
> > if (!cpu_has(cpui, X86_FEATURE_MSR))
> > continue;
> > - per_cpu(cpu_model, cpu) = ((cpui->x86_vendor << 16) |
> > - (cpui->x86 << 8) |
> > - (cpui->x86_model));
> > - per_cpu(cpu_modelflag, cpu) = get_cpu_modelflag(cpu);
> > + per_cpu(cpu_modelflag, cpu) = get_cpu_flag(cpui);
> > + if (!per_cpu(cpu_modelflag, cpu))
> > + send_report(per_cpu(cpu_priv_count, cpu), cpui);
>
> This means that if the CPU is not enumerated in the model table
> explicitly, we'll fall back to some really minimal output, right?
>
Yes.
--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists