[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0904290907g48e94e74ye97aae593f6ac519@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:07:51 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Elladan <elladan@...imo.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: evict use-once pages first (v2)
Hi
Looks good than previous version. but I have one question.
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index eac9577..4471dcb 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1489,6 +1489,18 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
> nr[l] = scan;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * When the system is doing streaming IO, memory pressure here
> + * ensures that active file pages get deactivated, until more
> + * than half of the file pages are on the inactive list.
> + *
> + * Once we get to that situation, protect the system's working
> + * set from being evicted by disabling active file page aging.
> + * The logic in get_scan_ratio protects anonymous pages.
> + */
> + if (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE] > nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE])
> + nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] = 0;
> +
> while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] ||
> nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]) {
> for_each_evictable_lru(l) {
we handle active_anon vs inactive_anon ratio by shrink_list().
Why do you insert this logic insert shrink_zone() ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists