lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49F8A314.4000007@freemail.hu>
Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:57:24 +0200
From:	Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] v4l2: modify return value of VIDIOC_REQBUFS ioctl

The V4L2 ioctls usually return 0 when the operation was successful
and -1 in case of error. Currently VIDIOC_REQBUFS returns the
number of buffers which is redundant because this information is
available in count field of struct v4l2_requestbuffers. The
V4L2 API specification, revision 0.24 [1] explicitly specifies for
VIDIOC_REQBUFS that the return value shall be 0 on success.

The patch was tested with v4l-test 0.13 [2] with vivi driver.

References:
[1] V4L2 API specification, revision 0.24
    http://v4l2spec.bytesex.org/spec/r13696.htm

[2] v4l-test: Test environment for Video For Linux Two API
    http://v4l-test.sourceforge.net/

Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <nm127@...email.hu>
---
--- linux-2.6.30-rc3/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c.orig	2009-04-22 05:07:00.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.30-rc3/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c	2009-04-29 18:30:15.000000000 +0200
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ int videobuf_reqbufs(struct videobuf_que
 	}

 	req->count = retval;
+	retval = 0;

  done:
 	mutex_unlock(&q->vb_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ