[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1241032265.5247.25.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:11:05 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Knoblauch <knobi@...bisoft.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tigran aivazian <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Analyzed/Solved: Booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 15:34 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:18:45PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > /etc/fstab, perhaps? That definitely looks like two mount(2) had to
> > > have been done to cause that...
> >
> > Yeah, but how does one go about doing that?
> >
> > Using mount -f, I can convince mount to succeed, but I still have only
> > one entry in /proc/mounts, despite what my mount binary imagines.
>
> Huh?
> -f Causes everything to be done except for the actual system call;
> if it's not obvious, this ``fakes'' mounting the file system.
> This option is useful in conjunction with the -v flag to deter-
> mine what the mount command is trying to do. It can also be used
> to add entries for devices that were mounted earlier with the -n
>
> What are you talking about?
Me? My binary lost touch with reality, but I couldn't induce it to
produce two /proc/mount entries. I thought that's what I said.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists