[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090429220037.GA8604@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:00:37 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot
even when ignore_ppc=0
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:39:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> I don't know about XP's copy of intelppm.sys, but this would seem to confirm
> that WS03 and WS08 check _PPC at boot time.
Ok, so that makes things interesting. From what we know about the T60
(and based on Ingo's report), _PPC may evaluate to 2 on bootup. However,
if this is ignored then later notifications are correct. This implies
that Windows either ignores the initial evaluation or does something
that triggers a notification.
The only notifications appear to be sent from event methods, so there's
nothing obvious there that we can trigger. I'm actually quite confused
by this now. Ingo, if you re-add that block, does your system stop
working again?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists