[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090428.223708.168741998.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, mingo@...e.hu,
dada1@...mosbay.com, zbr@...emap.net, peterz@...radead.org,
jarkao2@...il.com, paulus@...ba.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
kaber@...sh.net, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
jengelh@...ozas.de, r000n@...0n.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: revised locking for x_tables
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> Ack.
>>
>> It could do with the update from Eric about how non-current CPU writelocks
>> only require preemp-disable around get_counters() (and then the
>> local_bh_disable() only around the current-CPU case).
>
> Btw, regardless, that's an incremental improvement, and does not negate
> the "Ack" part.
I've applied this, thanks everyone!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists