[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090430151008.D21C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:11:15 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balaji Rao <balajirrao@...il.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] cpuacct: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING don't prevent percpu cputime count
Changelog:
since v1
- use percpu_counter_sum() instead percpu_counter_read()
-------------------------------------
Subject: [PATCH v2] cpuacct: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING don't prevent percpu cputime count
cpuacct_update_stats() is called at every tick updating. and it use percpu_counter
for avoiding performance degression.
For archs which define VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING, every tick would result
in >1000 units of cputime updates and since this is much much greater
than percpu_batch_counter, we end up taking spinlock on every tick.
This patch change batch rule. now, any cpu can store "percpu_counter_bach * jiffies"
cputime in per-cpu cache.
it mean this patch don't have behavior change if VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=n.
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@...il.com>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: b/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/sched.c 2009-04-30 11:37:47.000000000 +0900
+++ b/kernel/sched.c 2009-04-30 14:17:00.000000000 +0900
@@ -10221,6 +10221,7 @@ struct cpuacct {
};
struct cgroup_subsys cpuacct_subsys;
+static s32 cpuacct_batch;
/* return cpu accounting group corresponding to this container */
static inline struct cpuacct *cgroup_ca(struct cgroup *cgrp)
@@ -10250,6 +10251,9 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *cpuac
if (!ca->cpuusage)
goto out_free_ca;
+ if (!cpuacct_batch)
+ cpuacct_batch = jiffies_to_cputime(percpu_counter_batch);
+
for (i = 0; i < CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS; i++)
if (percpu_counter_init(&ca->cpustat[i], 0))
goto out_free_counters;
@@ -10376,7 +10380,7 @@ static int cpuacct_stats_show(struct cgr
int i;
for (i = 0; i < CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
- s64 val = percpu_counter_read(&ca->cpustat[i]);
+ s64 val = percpu_counter_sum(&ca->cpustat[i]);
val = cputime64_to_clock_t(val);
cb->fill(cb, cpuacct_stat_desc[i], val);
}
@@ -10446,7 +10450,7 @@ static void cpuacct_update_stats(struct
ca = task_ca(tsk);
do {
- percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val);
+ __percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val, cpuacct_batch);
ca = ca->parent;
} while (ca);
rcu_read_unlock();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists