linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: powerpc: allow use of limited-function counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090430065856.GA16737@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:58:56 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: powerpc: allow use of limited-function
	counters


* Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > [ Note, i saw some fuzz in those files. It applied fine but maybe 
> >   you have some local changes in them that are not in 
> >   tip:perfcounters/core yet? You might want to double check that. ]
> 
> I think it was just Robert Richter's changes that caused the fuzz. 
> The end result seems to be OK.

ah, indeed - the rename:

  4aeb0b4: perfcounters: rename struct hw_perf_counter_ops into struct pmu

changed context lines in your patch causing the fuzz. The mechanic 
rename changed quite a bit of stuff in the powerpc driver - we were 
lucky that your rather large patch still merged cleanly.

Btw, if in the future such renames cause problems for any pending 
patch of yours we can always pick up your patches first and then 
re-do the rename.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/