[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090430163539.7a882cef.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:35:39 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"hugh@...itas.com" <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix stale swap cache leak v5
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:16:27 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> This is v5 but all codes are rewritten.
>
> After this patch, when memcg is used,
> 1. page's swapcount is checked after I/O (without locks). If the page is
> stale swap cache, freeing routine will be scheduled.
> 2. vmscan.c calls try_to_free_swap() when __remove_mapping() fails.
>
> Works well for me. no extra resources and no races.
>
> Because my office will be closed until May/7, I'll not be able to make a
> response. Posting this for showing what I think of now.
>
I found a hole immediately after posted this...sorry. plz ignore this patch/
see you again in the next month.
-Kame
> This should be fixed before posting softlimit etc...
> ==
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>
> In general, Linux's swp_entry handling is done by combination of lazy techniques
> and global LRU. It works well but when we use mem+swap controller, some more
> strict cotroll is appropriate. Otherwise, swp_entry used by a cgroup will be
> never freed until global LRU works. In a system where memcg is well-configured,
> global LRU doesn't work frequently.
>
> Example A) Assume a swap cache which is not mapped.
> CPU0 CPU1
> zap_pte().... shrink_page_list()
> free_swap_and_cache() lock_page()
> page seems busy.
>
> Example B) Assume swapin-readahed.
> CPU0 CPU1
> zap_pte() read_swap_cache_async()
> swap_duplicate().
> swap_entry_free() = 1
> find_get_page()=> NULL.
> add_to_swap_cache().
> issue swap I/O.
>
> There are many patterns of this kind of race (but no problems).
>
> free_swap_and_cache() is called for freeing swp_entry. But it is a best-effort
> function. If the swp_entry/page seems busy, swp_entry is not freed.
> This is not a problem because global-LRU will find SwapCache at page reclaim.
> But...
>
> If memcg is used, on the other hand, global LRU may not work. Then, above
> unused SwapCache will not be freed.
> (unmapped SwapCache occupy swp_entry but never be freed if not on memcg's LRU)
>
> So, even if there are no tasks in a cgroup, swp_entry usage still remains.
> In bad case, OOM by mem+swap controller is triggerred by this "leak" of
> swp_entry as Nishimura repoted.
>
> This patch tries to fix racy case of free_swap_and_cache() and I/O by checking
> swap's refnct again after I/O. And add a hook to vmscan.c.
> After this patch applied, follwoing test works well.
>
> # echo 1-2M > ../memory.limit_in_bytes
> # run tasks under memcg.
> # kill all tasks and make memory.tasks empty
> # check memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes == memory.usage_in_bytes and
> there is no _used_ swp_entry.
>
> Changelog: v4->v5
> - completely new design.
> - added nolock page_swapcount.
> - checks all swap I/O.
>
> Reported-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> include/linux/swap.h | 1
> mm/page_io.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/swapfile.c | 37 +++++++++++++++
> mm/vmscan.c | 31 ++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24/mm/page_io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24.orig/mm/page_io.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24/mm/page_io.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,123 @@
> #include <linux/writeback.h>
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +/*
> + * When memory cgroup is used, race between read/write-swap and zap-swap can
> + * be a leak of swp_entry accounted. So we have to check the status at
> + * the end of swap-io. If memory cgroup is not used, Global LRU will find
> + * unused swap-cache finally. (But this is too lazy for memcg.)
> + */
> +
> +struct swapio_check {
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + void *swap_bio_list;
> + struct delayed_work work;
> +} stale_swap_check;
> +
> +
> +static void mem_cgroup_check_stale_swap(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct bio *bio;
> + struct page *page;
> + struct swapio_check *sc;
> + int nr = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
> + swp_entry_t entry;
> +
> + sc = &stale_swap_check;
> +
> + while (nr--) {
> + cond_resched();
> + spin_lock_irq(&sc->lock);
> + bio = sc->swap_bio_list;
> + if (bio)
> + sc->swap_bio_list = bio->bi_next;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&sc->lock);
> + if (!bio)
> + break;
> + entry.val = (unsigned long)bio->bi_private;
> + bio_put(bio);
> +
> + page = find_get_page(&swapper_space, entry.val);
> + if (!page || page_mapped(page))
> + continue;
> + lock_page(page);
> + /*
> + * When it's mapped, this page passed checks in do_swap_page()
> + * and we don't have to do any more. All other necessary checks
> + * will be done in try_to_free_swap().
> + */
> + if (!page_mapped(page))
> + try_to_free_swap(page);
> + unlock_page(page);
> + put_page(page);
> + }
> + if (sc->swap_bio_list)
> + schedule_delayed_work(&sc->work, HZ/10);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * We can't call try_to_free_swap directly here because of caller's context.
> + */
> +static void mem_cgroup_swapio_check_again(struct bio *bio, struct page *page)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct swapio_check *sc;
> + swp_entry_t entry;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* check swap count here. If swp_entry is stable, nothing to do.*/
> + if (likely(mem_cgroup_staleswap_hint(page)))
> + return;
> + /* reuse bio if this bio is ready to be freed. */
> + ret = atomic_inc_return(&bio->bi_cnt);
> + /* Any other reference other than us ? */
> + if (unlikely(ret > 2)) {
> + bio_put(bio);
> + return;
> + }
> + /*
> + * We don't want to grab this page....record swp_entry instead of page.
> + */
> + entry.val = page_private(page);
> + bio->bi_private = (void *)entry.val;
> +
> + sc = &stale_swap_check;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&sc->lock, flags);
> + /* link bio */
> + bio->bi_next = sc->swap_bio_list;
> + sc->swap_bio_list = bio;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sc->lock, flags);
> + /*
> + * Swap I/O is tend to be countinous. Do check in batched manner.
> + */
> + if (!delayed_work_pending(&sc->work))
> + schedule_delayed_work(&sc->work, HZ/10);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init setup_stale_swap_check(void)
> +{
> + struct swapio_check *sc;
> +
> + sc = &stale_swap_check;
> + spin_lock_init(&sc->lock);
> + sc->swap_bio_list = NULL;
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sc->work, mem_cgroup_check_stale_swap);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(setup_stale_swap_check);
> +
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTRL */
> +
> +static inline
> +void mem_cgroup_swapio_check_again(struct bio *bio, struct page *page)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +
> +
> static struct bio *get_swap_bio(gfp_t gfp_flags, pgoff_t index,
> struct page *page, bio_end_io_t end_io)
> {
> @@ -66,6 +183,8 @@ static void end_swap_bio_write(struct bi
> (unsigned long long)bio->bi_sector);
> ClearPageReclaim(page);
> }
> + /* While PG_writeback, this page is stable ...then, call this here */
> + mem_cgroup_swapio_check_again(bio, page);
> end_page_writeback(page);
> bio_put(bio);
> }
> @@ -85,6 +204,7 @@ void end_swap_bio_read(struct bio *bio,
> } else {
> SetPageUptodate(page);
> }
> + mem_cgroup_swapio_check_again(bio, page);
> unlock_page(page);
> bio_put(bio);
> }
> Index: mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24.orig/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -586,6 +586,30 @@ void putback_lru_page(struct page *page)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTRL
> +/*
> + * Even if we don't call this, global LRU will finally find this SwapCache and
> + * free swap entry in the next loop. But, when memcg is used, we may have
> + * smaller chance to call global LRU's memory reclaim code.
> + * Freeing unused swap entry in aggresive way is good for avoid "leak" of swap
> + * entry accounting.
> + */
> +static inline void unuse_swapcache_check_again(struct page *page)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The page is locked, but have extra reference from somewhere.
> + * In typical case, rotate_reclaimable_page()'s extra refcnt makes
> + * __remove_mapping fail. (see mm/swap.c)
> + */
> + if (PageSwapCache(page))
> + try_to_free_swap(page);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void unuse_swapcache_check_again(struct page *page)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>
> /*
> * shrink_page_list() returns the number of reclaimed pages
> @@ -758,9 +782,12 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(st
> }
> }
>
> - if (!mapping || !__remove_mapping(mapping, page))
> + if (!mapping)
> goto keep_locked;
> -
> + if (!__remove_mapping(mapping, page)) {
> + unuse_swapcache_check_again(page);
> + goto keep_locked;
> + }
> /*
> * At this point, we have no other references and there is
> * no way to pick any more up (removed from LRU, removed
> Index: mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24/mm/swapfile.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24.orig/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -528,6 +528,43 @@ static inline int page_swapcount(struct
> return count;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +static inline int page_swapused_nolock(struct page *page)
> +{
> + swp_entry_t entry;
> + unsigned long type, offset;
> + struct swap_info_struct *p;
> +
> + entry.val = page_private(page);
> + type = swp_type(entry);
> + VM_BUG_ON(type >= nr_swapfiles);
> +
> + offset = swp_offset(entry);
> + p = &swap_info[type];
> + VM_BUG_ON(!(p->flags & SWP_USED));
> + VM_BUG_ON(!(p->swap_map[offset]));
> +
> + smp_rmb();
> + return p->swap_map[offset] != 1;
> +}
> +/*
> + * Use a lapping function not to allow reuse this function other than memcg.
> + */
> +int mem_cgroup_staleswap_hint(struct page *page)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The page may not under lock_page() but Writeback is set in that case.
> + * Then, swap_map is stable when this is called.
> + * Very terrible troube will not occur even if page_swapused_nolock()
> + * returns wrong value.
> + * Because this can be called via interrupt context, we use nolock
> + * version of swap's refcnt check.
> + */
> + if (!PageSwapCache(page) || page_mapped(page))
> + return 1;
> + return page_swapused_nolock(page);
> +}
> +#endif
> /*
> * We can write to an anon page without COW if there are no other references
> * to it. And as a side-effect, free up its swap: because the old content
> Index: mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24/include/linux/swap.h
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24.orig/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ mmotm-2.6.30-Apr24/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ static inline void disable_swap_token(vo
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_swapcache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t ent);
> +extern int mem_cgroup_staleswap_hint(struct page *page);
> #else
> static inline void
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_swapcache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t ent)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists