[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49F96E96.5040107@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:25:42 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: petkovbb@...il.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
bzolnier@...il.com, petkovbb@...glemail.com,
sshtylyov@...mvista.com, mike.miller@...com,
chirag.kantharia@...com, Eric.Moore@....com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
zaitcev@...hat.com, Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
paul.clements@...eleye.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
tim@...erelk.net, jeremy@...source.com, adrian@...en.demon.co.uk,
oakad@...oo.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
ballabio_dario@....com, davem@...emloft.net, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
Markus.Lidel@...dowconnect.com, bharrosh@...asas.com,
Doug Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] block: add rq->resid_len
Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> And I like it too, we've been coming up with all sorts of hacks in
>>> ide-atapi wrt to residual completion and accounting of what got xferred
>>> already and rq->resid_len is much more cleaner, IMHO.
>>>
>>> /me testing...
>> AFAICT, residual count handling in ide was most broken.
Oooh... It was "mostly broken" not "most broken". Where went my l and
y?
> Tell me about it :).
>
>> This patch doesn't fix anything other than making it report 0
>> resid_len on SG_IO which is usually better than reporting full
>> residual count. The only place inside ide where residual count is used
>> in the tape driver to determine actually transferred size. That part
>> works okay with the patch applied.
>
>> Hmmm... maybe it's about time to finally clean up residual count
>> handling in ide and libata, which BTW doesn't do anything about it at
>> the moment.
>
> Completely agreed. This doesn't do anything about it right now but
> with rq->resid_len in place I could get rid of a bunch of pc->xferred,
> cmd->nleft and similar on-stack structs we've been introducing, and use
> solely an rq in the LLD. I'll get to do some experimenting tomorrow and
> whip up some cleanup patches in order to see how it could look exactly.
> Stay tuned.
Yay, cool. :-)
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists