[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090430223212.GA16341@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:32:12 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/88] 2.6.28.10-stable review
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 06:44:50PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.28.10 release.
> >
> > NOTE! This is going to be the last release in the 2.6.28-stable series!
>
> Could you be convinced to keep 2.6.28-stable around for a little longer?
Not really.
> 2.6.29 is still much too young, as one can see from the size of 2.6.29.2,
That is mostly because people are learning to submit more patches to the
-stable queue, not because of any implicit problems with the 2.6.29
kernel series that I have seen.
> and the fact that the queue for 2.6.29 isn't even empty yet and there are
> already more patches waiting to get queued...
Yes there are, I will work on that next. But I don't see anything
"serious" in there that should be in the .28 kernel, do you?
Traditionally we've dropped the last -stable after the .2 release of the
new series, why would we change that now? We only have so much time to
do this kind of work, and maintaining 3 -stable trees is a major pain,
trust me...
However, if you wish to take over 2.6.28 and maintain it after this
release, I have no objection, just let me know.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists