[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49FA3606.50808@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:36:38 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
CC: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>,
Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...s-3g.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...gle.com>,
Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Implementing NVMHCI...
Jörn Engel wrote:
> But like it or not, the market seems to be moving in that direction.
> Which means we will have "block devices" that have all the interfaces of
> disks and behave much like flash - modulo the crap FTL.
One driving goal behind NVMHCI was to avoid disk-originated interfaces,
because they are not as well suited to flash storage.
The NVMHCI command set (distinguished from NVMHCI, the silicon) is
specifically targetted towards flash.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists