[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090430234824.GC7901@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 03:48:24 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] spi_mpc83xx: Add small delay after asserting
chip-select line
This is needed for some underlaying GPIO controllers that may be
a bit slow, or if chip-select signal need some time to stabilize.
For what it's worth, we already have the similar delay for
chip-select de-assertion case.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
index 08b49d2..d378d5e 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
@@ -383,8 +383,10 @@ static void mpc83xx_spi_work(struct work_struct *work)
break;
}
- if (cs_change)
+ if (cs_change) {
mpc83xx_spi_chipselect(spi, BITBANG_CS_ACTIVE);
+ ndelay(nsecs);
+ }
cs_change = t->cs_change;
if (t->len)
status = mpc83xx_spi_bufs(spi, t);
--
1.6.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists