[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090430045525.GC6110@eskimo.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:55:26 -0700
From: Elladan <elladan@...imo.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Elladan <elladan@...imo.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Swappiness vs. mmap() and interactive response
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:43:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:14:39 -0700 Elladan <elladan@...imo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Elladan, have you checked to see whether the Mapped: number in
> > > /proc/meminfo is decreasing?
> >
> > Yes, Mapped decreases while a large file copy is ongoing. It increases again
> > if I use the GUI.
>
> OK. If that's still happening to an appreciable extent after you've
> increased /proc/sys/vm/swappiness then I'd wager that we have a
> bug/regression in that area.
>
> Local variable `scan' in shrink_zone() is vulnerable to multiplicative
> overflows on large zones, but I doubt if you have enough memory to
> trigger that bug.
No, I only have 4GB.
This appears to happen with swappiness set to 0 or 60.
-Elladan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists